Powermat Technologies, Ltd. v. Anker Innovations, Ltd. – United States District Court in the Eastern District of Texas – A patent infringement case related to power supply.
Provided interpretation services for multiple days of depositions over Zoom in October 2024 (Mayer Brown & Fish Richardson)
SEC v. Binance – A SEC enforcement action related to digital asset trading platforms and legality of crypto currency operations.
Provided interpretation service for deposition in Dubai in July 2024 (SEC & Gibson Dunn)
Samsung Display v. BOE Technology Group – An US International Trade Commission (ITC) Investigation on misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair methods of competition and infringement of intellectual property.
Provided interpretation services for 4 weeks of depositions in Hong Kong in June 2024 (Quinn Emanuel & Mayer Brown)
Netgear Inc., v. TP-LINK Technologies Co., Ltd., et al. – United States International Trade Commission Investigation No. 337-TA-1361 re: Certain Wi-Fi Routers, Wi-Fi Devices, Mesh Wi-Fi Network Devices, and Hardware and Software Components Thereof – A patent infringement case related to wifi devices.
Provided interpretation services at the trial in Washington DC.
I-MAB Biopharma v. Inhibrx, Inc. – United States District Court for the District of Delaware – Misappropriation of trade secrets.
Provided written translation of over 200 pages of exhibits and interpretation services for a series of depositions over Zoom.
WEBROOT, INC. and OPEN TEXT, INC., v. TREND MICRO INC., - United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Waco Division – A patent infringement case pertaining on malware detection, network security and endpoint protection technology.
Provided interpretation services for a series of depositions.
TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC., v. SZ DJI TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., DJI EUROPE B.V., and DJI TECHNOLOGY, INC., – United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Waco Division – A patent infringement case relating to manufacture & distribution of drones.
Provided interpretation services for a series of depositions via Zoom and in Palo Alto.
Krafton v. NetEase - A copyright dispute.
Provided interpretation services for a series of trials.
Moonbug Entertainment Limited v. Babybus (Fujian) Network Technology Co., Ltd. – United States District Court for the Northern District of California – A copyright infringement case.
Provided written translation of over 300 pages of exhibits and interpretation services for multiple days of depositions over Zoom and 4 weeks of trial in San Francisco.
Krafton v. NetEase - A copyright dispute.
Provided written translation of over 200 pages of exhibits and interpretation services for multiple days of depositions in Los Angeles, Redwood City, Hong Kong and 3 weeks of trial in Redwood City.
The Ridge Wallet LLC v. Mosaic Brands, Inc., et al. - United States International Trade Commission Investigation No. 337-TA-1355 in the Matter of CERTAIN COMPACT WALLETS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF.
Provided interpretation service for a series of depositions.
WSOU Investments, LLC v. OnePlus Technology – United States District Court for the Western District of Texas - A patent infringement case.
Provided interpretation service for a series of depositions
NXP USA Inc. v. MediaTek, MediaTek USA, Amazon.com, and Best Buy – United States District Court in Eastern District of Texas – A patent infringement case related to wifi technology in smart mobile phones.
Provided interpretation service for deposition with witness in Macau.
Shenzhen Smoore Technology Limited v. 40 Proposed Respondents – United States International Trade Commission Investigation No. 337-TA-128 in the Matter of Certain Oil-Vaping Cartridges, Components Thereof, And Products Containing the Same – A patents and trademark infringement case.
Provided interpretation service for series of depositions with witnesses in Macau.
Innovative Foundry Technologies LLC v. 20 Proposed Respondents including BBK, Vivo, OnePlus, OPPO, Hisense, TCL, TTE, TCT, VIZIO, MediaTek, Mstar, Qualcomm, TSMC – United States International Trade Commission Investigation No. 337-TA-1149 in the Matter of Certain Semiconductor Devices, Integrated Circuits, and Consumer Products Containing the Same.
Provided interpretation service for series of depositions in Hong Kong.
Huawei Technologies Inc. and Futurewei Technologies Inc. vs. Cnex Labs Inc – A trade secrets misappropriation case involving Solid State Disk (SSD) technology, Advanced Computing Network (ACN) technology, and Non-Volatile Memory Express (NVMe) related technology.
Provided interpretation Service for deposition in Palo Alto.
Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc., Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation, and System General Corporation – A patent litigation pertaining to switches in the power conversion integrated circuit devices used in power supplies for electronic devices such as cellular telephones, LCD monitors, and computers.
Provided interpretation Services for trial prep and trial in Delaware.
TQ Delta, LLC. v. Zyxel Communications, Inc. and Zyxel Communications Corporation – A patent litigation pertaining to digital subscriber line (DSL) technology, including but not limited to asymmetric digital subscriber line (ADSL) technology and very-high-bit-rate digital subscriber line (VDSL) technology.
Provided interpretation Services for a series of depositions in Los Angeles.
Lumileds LLC. v. Elec-Tech International Co. – A trade secret misappropriation case pertaining to high power LEDs used in flash phones, automotive headlights, and general illumination.
Provided interpretation Services for trial in San Jose.
Lithium Ion Batteries Antitrust Litigation – Acer, Gateway, TracFone, Microsoft Mobile, Dell, Flextronics, vs. 25 defendants including Hitachi, Maxell, Panasonic, Sanyo, Toshiba, Samsung, NEC, Sony, LG, etc.
Provided interpretation Services for a series of depositions in San Francisco.
Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litigation – A class and civil action filed in the U.S. District Court of Northern California, naming a series of Japanese, Korean and Taiwanese manufacturers as defendants, including CPT, LG, Mitsubishi, Panasonic, Phillips, Samsung SDI, Technicolor, Toshiba, TDA, etc.
Was recommended and approved by all parties and subsequently appointed by the court as the neutral translator to assist the special master in resolving the parties’ translation objections and disputes.
Optical Disk Drive Antitrust Litigation – Acer Inc, Acer America, Gateway Inc. and Gateway U.S. Retail vs. 20 defendants including Lite-On, NEC, Philips, Pioneer, Samsung, Sony, Toshiba, etc.
Provided interpretation Services for a series of depositions in San Francisco.
Masimo Corporation v. Mindray DS USA, Inc., et al. – A patent dispute case filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California regarding innovative source code programming design for life support and patient monitoring devices including blood oxygen saturation monitoring device Oximeter.
Provided interpretation Services a series of depositions in San Diego, California.
Ziptronix, Inc. vs. Omnivision Technologies Inc., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. (TSMC) and TSMC North America Corp. – A patent dispute case filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Oakland Division regarding innovative technologies with significant advances in the field of semiconductor processing including specialized bonding of surfaces and materials.
Provided interpretation Services for a week of depositions in Hsinchu, Taiwan.
InterDigital Communications, Inc., InterDigital Technology Corporation, IPR Licensing, Inc., and InterDigital Holdings, Inc. vs. 10 Proposed Respondents including Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Nokia Corporation, Nokia Inc., ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA) Inc., Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA, Inc., and FutureWei Technologies, Inc. dba. Huawei Technologies (USA) – United States International Trade Commission Investigation No. 337-TA- in the Matter of Certain Wireless Devices with 3G and/or 4G capabilities, including components thereof.
Provided interpretation Services for a series of depositions in Hong Kong.
Softview vs. Apple, AT&T Mobility, Dell, HTC Corp. HTC America, Huawei Technologies, Futurewei Technologies, Kyocera, Kyocera Wireless Corp., LG Electronics, LG Electronics USA, LG Electronics Mobilecomm USA, Motorola Mobility, Samsung Electronics, Samsung Electronics America, Samsung Telecommunications America, and Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA) – A patent dispute case filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware regarding web browsers for mobile devices.
Provided interpretation Services for a series of depositions in Hong Kong.
Hitachi Metals, Ltd. and Hitachi Metals North Carolina Ltd. vs. 29 Proposed Respondents – United States International Trade Commission Investigation No. 337-TA-2908 in the Matter of Certain Sintered Rare Earth Magnets, Methods of Making Same and Products Containing Same.
Provided interpretation Services for a series of depositions in Seoul, Korea and in Hong Kong.
Powertech Technology Inc. vs. Tessera, Inc. – A patent licensing and breach of contract civil action filed in the U.S. District Court of Northern California.
Provided interpretation services for several series of depositions of PTI witnesses in San Francisco, Los Angeles and in Taiwan.
TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation – A class and civil action filed in the U.S. District Court of Northern California, naming 24 Japanese, Korean and Taiwanese manufacturers and their affiliates as defendants, including Samsung, LG Philips, AU Optronics and Chi Mei, etc.
Provided interpretation services for one and a half week of AUO’s depositions in Taipei, Taiwan. Provided interpretation services for a week of Chi Mei’s client preparations and depositions in San Francisco. Provided interpretation services for 3 days of Sharp Electronic’s deposition in San Francisco. Provided interpretation services for 1 day of Dell Inc.’s deposition in Austin, TX.
SEC Investigations, Enforcement Actions and Private Civil Litigations against Chinese Companies Publicly Traded in the U.S. – A series of actions by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Congress, and the plaintiffs’ class action alleging potential securities fraud by Chinese companies trading in the U.S.
Provided interpretation services for internal board meetings, audit committee meetings and depositions both in the U.S. and in Hong Kong for a number of cases, including Fuqi International Inc., China Agritech Inc., and Orient Paper Inc, etc.
United States vs. AUO Optronics – An antitrust trial in the U.S. District Court of Northern California.
Provided interpretation services for a Chi Mei witness preparation and worked as a check interpreter during the 2-day witness testimony in trial in San Francisco.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) vs. Acer Inc., Acer America Corporation, Acer America Holding Company, Boardwalk Capital Holding Company, and Gateway Inc. – A patent litigation involving “Wireless LAN”.
Provided interpretation services for 2 days of Acer’s deposition in San Francisco.
Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation – A class action filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, naming 46 airlines as defendants, including Air China Cargo Company Ltd., Air China Ltd., Asiana Airlines, Inc., China Airlines, Ltd., EVA Airways Corporation, Japan Airlines International Co., Ltd., Korean Airlines Co., Ltd., Malaysia Airlines, Nippon Cargo Airlines Co., Ltd., Singapore Airlines Cargo PTE, Ltd., and Singapore Airlines, Ltd., etc.
Provided interpretation services for 2 days of EVA Airways Corporation’s deposition in Los Angeles.
U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Investigation of Chi Mei Optoelectronics (CMO), the World’s 4th Largest TFT-LCD Maker.
Provided interpretation services for client preparation, DOJ interview, arrangement, plea, change of plea and booking of a top CMO executive.
Danone Corp vs. Wahaha et. al. – High Profile International Trademark Dispute and Unfair Business Practice Suit in the United States, China, the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) International Court of Arbitration in France and the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (“SCC”) in Sweden.
Provided translations for over 160 documents and provided interpretations for depositions and trials in Hong Kong and in the United States.
Laserdynamics Inc. vs. Asus Computer Int’l, Quanta Storage America Inc., Quanta Computer USA Inc., Asustek Computer, Inc., Quanta Storage, Inc., and Quanta Computer, Inc. – A patent dispute case involving computer storage source code.
Worked as the check interpreter for a week of Quanta Storage Inc. depositions in Los Angeles.
LG. Philips vs. Chi Mei Optoelectronics (CMO), AU Optronics, AU Optronics America, Tatung, Tatung America and ViewSonic – A broad patent dispute case involving the design and manufacture of TFT LCD flat panel displays used on LCD portable computers, LCD computer monitors and LCD televisions.
Provided interpretations for client preparations and worked as the check interpreter for a week of CMO depositions in Los Angeles.
CpuMate Inc. and Golden Sun News Techniques Co., Ltd. vs. Acer America Corporation, Acer Inc. and Wistron Corporation – Patent litigation case involving heat dissipating device inside the Central Processing Units (CPU) of desktop computers and servers.
Provided translations for deposition transcripts and declarations.
Funai Corporation vs. 14 Proposed Respondents – United States International Trade Commission Investigation No. 337-TA-617 in the Matter of Certain Digital Televisions and Certain Products Containing Same and Methods of Using Same.
Provided interpretations for 4 weeks of depositions of various respondents.
Pass & Seymour, Inc. vs. 15 Proposed Respondents – United States International Trade Commission Investigation No. 337-TA-615 in the Matter of Certain Ground Fault Circuit Interrupters and Products Containing the Same.
Provided interpretations for client preparations, worked as the check interpreter for a week of depositions in Hong Kong and provided translations of documents.
Ajinomoto Heartland LLC. vs. 5 Proposed Respondents – United States International Trade Commission Investigation No: 337-TA-571 in the Matter of Certain L-lysine Feed Products, Their Methods of Production and Genetic Constructs for Production.
Provided translations of various contracts and documents of technical data.
LG. Philips vs. Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd. (CPT) – A broad LCD patent dispute relating to TFT LCD panel technology.
Provided interpretations for client preparations and worked as the check interpreter for depositions.
ProMOS vs. Freescale – An infringement suit relating to three patents involving cache memory and tungsten interconnects.
Provided interpretations for depositions.
Wacom vs. Hanvon – An infringement suit relating to several patents covering electronic pen and tablet technology.
Provided interpretations for depositions.